Isabella Kruger vs Romane Longueville Head-to-Head Stats, Results & Performance Comparison
By Wojtek Kolan
Form
W W L W W L W L W L
Form
W L L W L W W L W LHead-2-Head: Kruger 1 - 0 Longueville
They have played 3 sets in total, with Kruger winning 2 and Longueville winning 1. The last match between Kruger and Longueville was at the W35 Koksijde, 05-08-2024, Q3, Clay with Isabella Kruger getting the victory 5-7 6-2 10-6.
| Players | Head-To-Head Match Wins |
|---|---|
| Isabella Kruger | 1 |
| Romane Longueville | 0 |
W35 Koksijde(05-08-2024)
5
7
6
2
10
6
| Kruger | Stats | Longueville |
|---|---|---|
| 0% (0-0) | YTD Win/Loss | 60% (9-6) |
| 1 | Head-to-Head | 0 |
| 838 | Ranking | N/A |
| 330 | Highest Rank | N/A |
| 20 | Age | 20 |
| - | Plays | - |
| 1 | Titles | 0 |
| 62% (92-56) | Career Total W/L | 51% (28-27) |
| $0 | Career Prize Money | $0 |
| 1 | Clay H2H | 0 |
Today’s Tennis Tips:
Uchijima VS Montgomery PREDICTION Clay
Mutua Madrid Open - Madrid wta
22 Apr 2025 / First
ODDS
OUR PREDICTION
EDGE
Joint VS Cirez PREDICTION Clay
Mutua Madrid Open - Madrid wta
23 Apr 2025 / First
ODDS
OUR PREDICTION
EDGE
Kruger VS Longueville H2H Matches played
| Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 5-7 6-2 10-6 |
Stats 
Isabella Kruger
Player
Romane Longueville
60%
(
52 of
87)
1st Serve %
63%
(
43 of
68)
3
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
5
63%
(
33 of
52)
1st Serve Won
51%
(
22 of
43)
40%
(
14 of
35)
2nd Serve Won
32%
(
8 of
25)
75%
(
6 of
8)
Break Points Won
45%
(
5 of
11)
46%
(
40 of
87)
Rtn Points Won
56%
(
38 of
68)
85
Total Points Won
70
|
||||
Kruger VS Longueville H2H Stats Used In Our Predictions
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 1 | H2H Matches | 0 |
| 2 | Sets Won | 1 |
| 21 | Games Won | 15 |
| 3 | Aces (Total) | 0 |
| 2 | Total Double Faults | 5 |
| 2:5:0 | Average Match Time | 2:5:0 |
| 60% (52/87) | 1st Serve % | 63% (43/68) |
| 63% (33/52) | 1st Serve Win % | 51% (22/43) |
| 40% (14/35) | 2nd Serve Win % | 32% (8/25) |
| 75% (6/8) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 45% (5/11) |
| 56% (38/68) | Return Points Win % | 46% (40/87) |
| 100% (1/1) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 0% (0/1) |
| 0% (0/0) | Best of 5 Sets Win % | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 0% (0/0) |
| 100% (1/1) | Deciding Set Win % | 0% (0/1) |
| 0% (0/0) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 0% (1/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 100% (1/1) |
| 100% (1/1) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 0% (0/0) |
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
Isabella Kruger Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R1 |
Stats
Federica Urgesi
Player
Isabella Kruger
66%
(
56 of
85)
1st Serve %
50%
(
52 of
103)
2
Aces
0
4
Double Faults
14
52%
(
29 of
56)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
30 of
52)
45%
(
13 of
29)
2nd Serve Won
35%
(
18 of
51)
39%
(
9 of
23)
Break Points Won
58%
(
7 of
12)
51%
(
43 of
85)
Rtn Points Won
53%
(
55 of
103)
97
Total Points Won
91
|
6-2 3-6 6-4 | H2H | ||
| QF | 6-4 6-3 | H2H | |||
| QF |
Stats
Lisa Zaar
Player
Isabella Kruger
63%
(
40 of
63)
1st Serve %
44%
(
34 of
77)
0
Aces
2
9
Double Faults
11
63%
(
25 of
40)
1st Serve Won
44%
(
15 of
34)
26%
(
6 of
23)
2nd Serve Won
49%
(
21 of
43)
50%
(
5 of
10)
Break Points Won
44%
(
4 of
9)
51%
(
32 of
63)
Rtn Points Won
53%
(
41 of
77)
72
Total Points Won
68
|
6-2 4-6 11-9 | H2H | ||
| Q1 | 6-0 6-0 | H2H | |||
| R2 |
Stats
Anastasia Abbagnato
Player
Isabella Kruger
60%
(
41 of
68)
1st Serve %
48%
(
31 of
65)
3
Aces
0
3
Double Faults
8
63%
(
26 of
41)
1st Serve Won
55%
(
17 of
31)
52%
(
14 of
27)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
13 of
34)
75%
(
6 of
8)
Break Points Won
38%
(
3 of
8)
41%
(
28 of
68)
Rtn Points Won
54%
(
35 of
65)
75
Total Points Won
58
|
6-3 7-5 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Isabella Kruger
Player
Vittoria Paganetti
58%
(
31 of
53)
1st Serve %
58%
(
32 of
55)
-
Aces
-
3
Double Faults
5
65%
(
20 of
31)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
19 of
32)
50%
(
11 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
22%
(
5 of
23)
60%
(
6 of
10)
Break Points Won
50%
(
2 of
4)
42%
(
22 of
53)
Rtn Points Won
56%
(
31 of
55)
62
Total Points Won
46
|
6-3 6-1 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Isabella Kruger
Player
Barbara Dessolis
51%
(
35 of
68)
1st Serve %
66%
(
37 of
56)
1
Aces
0
4
Double Faults
1
51%
(
18 of
35)
1st Serve Won
46%
(
17 of
37)
48%
(
16 of
33)
2nd Serve Won
21%
(
4 of
19)
50%
(
7 of
14)
Break Points Won
44%
(
4 of
9)
50%
(
34 of
68)
Rtn Points Won
63%
(
35 of
56)
69
Total Points Won
55
|
6-2 6-4 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Kajsa Rinaldo Persson
Player
Isabella Kruger
67%
(
33 of
49)
1st Serve %
61%
(
37 of
61)
1
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
4
70%
(
23 of
33)
1st Serve Won
54%
(
20 of
37)
63%
(
10 of
16)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
8 of
24)
50%
(
5 of
10)
Break Points Won
17%
(
1 of
6)
33%
(
16 of
49)
Rtn Points Won
54%
(
33 of
61)
66
Total Points Won
44
|
6-2 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Isabella Kruger
Player
Cagla Buyukakcay
67%
(
51 of
76)
1st Serve %
75%
(
80 of
106)
1
Aces
0
5
Double Faults
9
55%
(
28 of
51)
1st Serve Won
48%
(
38 of
80)
44%
(
11 of
25)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
11 of
26)
62%
(
8 of
13)
Break Points Won
60%
(
6 of
10)
49%
(
37 of
76)
Rtn Points Won
54%
(
57 of
106)
96
Total Points Won
86
|
6-3 2-6 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Isabella Kruger
Player
Jessica Pieri
72%
(
43 of
60)
1st Serve %
77%
(
43 of
56)
-
Aces
-
5
Double Faults
2
58%
(
25 of
43)
1st Serve Won
37%
(
16 of
43)
35%
(
6 of
17)
2nd Serve Won
46%
(
6 of
13)
100%
(
7 of
7)
Break Points Won
31%
(
4 of
13)
48%
(
29 of
60)
Rtn Points Won
61%
(
34 of
56)
65
Total Points Won
51
|
6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
view more
Romane Longueville Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| QF | 0-6 7-5 12-10 | H2H | |||
| Q2 | 6-0 6-0 | H2H | |||
| R1 |
Stats
Viktoria Morvayova
Player
Romane Longueville
70%
(
40 of
57)
1st Serve %
66%
(
46 of
70)
7
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
4
68%
(
27 of
40)
1st Serve Won
48%
(
22 of
46)
53%
(
9 of
17)
2nd Serve Won
54%
(
13 of
24)
36%
(
5 of
14)
Break Points Won
33%
(
2 of
6)
37%
(
21 of
57)
Rtn Points Won
50%
(
35 of
70)
71
Total Points Won
56
|
6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Romane Longueville
Player
Unknown Player
81%
(
26 of
32)
1st Serve %
70%
(
46 of
66)
1
Aces
1
0
Double Faults
3
92%
(
24 of
26)
1st Serve Won
57%
(
26 of
46)
83%
(
5 of
6)
2nd Serve Won
25%
(
5 of
20)
29%
(
5 of
17)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
9%
(
3 of
32)
Rtn Points Won
53%
(
35 of
66)
64
Total Points Won
34
|
6-2 6-1 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Romane Longueville
Player
Prathyusha Rachapudi
65%
(
39 of
60)
1st Serve %
55%
(
26 of
47)
0
Aces
1
4
Double Faults
10
64%
(
25 of
39)
1st Serve Won
42%
(
11 of
26)
52%
(
11 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
24%
(
5 of
21)
86%
(
6 of
7)
Break Points Won
29%
(
2 of
7)
40%
(
24 of
60)
Rtn Points Won
66%
(
31 of
47)
67
Total Points Won
40
|
6-3 6-1 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Gaeul Jang
Player
Romane Longueville
48%
(
27 of
56)
1st Serve %
67%
(
38 of
57)
1
Aces
0
5
Double Faults
3
63%
(
17 of
27)
1st Serve Won
53%
(
20 of
38)
62%
(
18 of
29)
2nd Serve Won
21%
(
4 of
19)
42%
(
5 of
12)
Break Points Won
50%
(
2 of
4)
38%
(
21 of
56)
Rtn Points Won
58%
(
33 of
57)
68
Total Points Won
45
|
6-4 6-1 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Romane Longueville
Player
Prathyusha Rachapudi
60%
(
32 of
53)
1st Serve %
56%
(
30 of
54)
0
Aces
0
5
Double Faults
5
81%
(
26 of
32)
1st Serve Won
67%
(
20 of
30)
57%
(
12 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
29%
(
7 of
24)
33%
(
4 of
12)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
4)
28%
(
15 of
53)
Rtn Points Won
50%
(
27 of
54)
65
Total Points Won
42
|
6-1 6-3 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Akanksha Dileep Nitture
Player
Romane Longueville
73%
(
44 of
60)
1st Serve %
58%
(
35 of
60)
2
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
3
68%
(
30 of
44)
1st Serve Won
54%
(
19 of
35)
31%
(
5 of
16)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
11 of
25)
44%
(
4 of
9)
Break Points Won
43%
(
3 of
7)
42%
(
25 of
60)
Rtn Points Won
50%
(
30 of
60)
65
Total Points Won
55
|
6-0 3-6 11-9 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Fabienne Gettwart
Player
Romane Longueville
71%
(
36 of
51)
1st Serve %
65%
(
47 of
72)
5
Aces
0
0
Double Faults
2
67%
(
24 of
36)
1st Serve Won
43%
(
20 of
47)
53%
(
8 of
15)
2nd Serve Won
64%
(
16 of
25)
71%
(
5 of
7)
Break Points Won
67%
(
2 of
3)
37%
(
19 of
51)
Rtn Points Won
50%
(
36 of
72)
68
Total Points Won
55
|
6-4 6-2 | H2H | ||
| QF | 6-3 7-6(5) | H2H | |||
view more
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 62% (92/56) | Win/Loss | 51% (28/27) |
| 61% (205/132) | Sets Win/Loss | 52% (66/60) |
| 55% (1681/1397) | Games Win/Loss | 51% (613/592) |
| 60% (57/38) | Hard Win/Loss | 59% (16/11) |
| 62% (24/15) | Clay Win/Loss | 42% (10/14) |
| 79% (11/3) | Indoor Hard W/L | 50% (2/2) |
| 0% (0/0) | Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) |
| 0.13 | Aces Per Game | 0.02 |
| 196 | Aces Total | 14 |
| 0.49 | Double Faults Per Game | 0.27 |
| 743 | Total Double Faults | 160 |
| 1:29:8 | Average Match Time | 1:4:48 |
| 456.76 | Average Opponent Rank | 264.27 |
| 60% (5242/8668) | 1st Serve % | 66% (1434/2189) |
| 62% (3263/5242) | 1st Serve Win % | 56% (805/1434) |
| 44% (1497/3426) | 2nd Serve Win % | 43% (326/755) |
| 50% (594/1197) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 48% (138/287) |
| 48% (4155/8674) | Return Points Win % | 47% (1019/2162) |
| 0% (0/0) | Slam W/L | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | Masters W/L | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | Main Tour W/L | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) |
| 63% (66/38) | Challenger W/L | 44% (7/9) |
| 59% (26/18) | Futures W/L | 54% (21/18) |
| 62% (90/146) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 51% (28/55) |
| 0% (0/0) | Best of 5 Sets Win % | 0% (0/0) |
| 47% (9/19) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 67% (6/9) |
| 47% (20/43) | Deciding Set Win % | 38% (6/16) |
| 93% (88/82) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 90% (31/28) |
| 7% (88/6) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 10% (31/3) |
| 15% (60/9) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 0% (24/0) |
Other Predictions
Today's Tennis Prediction News :
- Loading news...
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us [email protected]
